The closer the elections in the DNI and LC, the more aggravated the political situation around Ukraine and New Russia. In the last article we wrote about the fact that a number of signs the US decided to freeze the conflict in the Donbass. Against the background of the events in Syria on their part it is a reasonable compromise: a year in the US presidential elections, and the presence of Ukrainian problems unsolved, and even more hot war, greatly worsen the situation of the Democrats.
In this connection, as to defeat the Donbass militarily impossible for the Democrats it is advisable to leave while in Ukraine it like it is presenting it as a success: Minsk agreement executed, Ukraine has maintained its "territorial integrity", and thus the victory over the "Russian aggression "won. Especially important it is the eve of the anniversary session of the UN General Assembly.
Noteworthy publication in the "New York Times" Julianne Smith - director of the program strategy and governance at the Center for a New American Security and a former adviser to Vice President Joe Biden.
Publication is clearly aimed at Russia. Its content is to ensure that the United States cease to restrain Russia in Ukraine. Thus, Russia sent an unambiguous signal that the US really take a break and time to refuse from taking action in Ukraine in connection with Syria.
Smith writes that "the US will have with Russia to solve the Syrian issue, even though it is unpleasant", but it forced the United States to cease its efforts to "curb Russian aggression in Ukraine."
Thus, there is a change in American foreign policy. This is evidenced by the fact that the US has directly accused Kiev of corruption. But US ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Payette altogether ... Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office accused of undermining the anti-corruption reforms. "Instead of having to support reforms in Ukraine and to work towards the eradication of corruption, corrupt pests PGO worsen things, openly and aggressively undermining reforms", - said the American ambassador. But such statements are just not done.
At the same time, a strategic US not interested in such a development, since it is only the beginning of the reconstruction of Ukraine, which Russia will not back down. Therefore, in contrast to the DNI and LC Kiev's actions are inconsistent, despite its apparent intransigence.
Europe urges Kiev to perform in Minsk-2, and the US as well, but in fact are playing a double game. For this reason, from Kiev now and then heard contradictory statements. Since September 20, which occupies the presidency Ukrainian oligarch Valtsman (Poroshenko) said that "in the near future to announce the mobilization I have no plans."
"If they continue the peace process and we will be the withdrawal of foreign troops from the territory of Ukraine, the return of control over Ukrainian state border, we can reduce the amount of mobilization", - said Valtsman.
A day later, at a meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, the oligarch also acknowledged unwillingness of Ukraine to join the alliance, vaguely referring to the fact that "everything must be done to change the Ukraine to become a member of the European Union." The same is said and Stoltenberg.
But such statements consistently with deeds, because Ukraine is not necessary to take NATO official, when installed over her American protectorate. After all, in parallel with the Ukraine and NATO signed a declaration on strengthening military-technical cooperation.